Well, on behalf of all women, let me personally thank you,
Mr. Perry! It makes so much sense that a man would truly understand the needs
of a woman and her body. Right? Hardly! I have to wonder if Governor Perry even
stopped once to wonder what would be considered a win for Texas women.
Perhaps, access to basic available health care? The Planned
Parenthood program reaches far and wide across Texas and enables women to make
educated and supported decisions about their bodies and health. Continuing to
provide women with options and access would in my opinion be the winning plan.
Planned Parenthood does not offer abortion services. This is
a fact. Please give me a break that the mere mention of abortion is
equivalent to promoting it. If this is really something that people are going
to follow, what else could it apply to?
Good for Planned Parenthood for suing. I hope this case
stands as an example of how the
government can go too far. Free speech was implemented for a reason: to protect
citizens rights from unfair legislature control such this.
I find it interesting that the appeals court begrudgingly
released the injunction. I would like to know more about their rationale for
why they believe these actions do not violate the Constitution. It seems very
hypocritical that free speech can be allowed for disfavoring abortion and the
activities that promote abortion, but criticized and banned when the word
abortion is said or an organization has an affiliation with the word.
So, Mr. Perry, I ask you this. How do the Texas women win
when their rights are reduced and they lose access to their basic health care
facilities? Maybe you need to explain
what game you are playing so that we can understand why you decided there was
anyone who won here.
No comments:
Post a Comment